Saturday, December 10, 2016

Ian Bayne is Running for Mayor of Bloomington

Ian Bayne (Photo courtesy Facebook/Ian.Bayne)
Old news, but still worthy of a double facepalm; Ian Bayne has thrown his hat into the ring for mayor of Bloomington. Based on Bayne's history of making outrageous statements, it's fair to assume that this hat is made up entirely of tin foil.

For those who aren't familiar with Ian Bayne, he was the candidate in the 2014 GOP primary for the 11th congressional district who failed to garner more than 4% of the vote, and who made national headlines during that campaign - of the laughing stock variety - for referring to Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty fame as the Rosa Parks of our time. Apparently, in Bayne's world, pushing back against legitimate criticism of your own bigoted commentary is as courageous as facing the prospect of violence and incarceration for pushing back against actual bigotry. You just can't make this stuff up folks.

While the nation as a whole got to witness a single instance of Bayne's stupidity, we in central Illinois became accustomed to a steady diet after the failed candidate was hired to provide conservative commentary on a local radio station. Apparently, breathtaking stupidity is not an impediment for employment at Cities 92.9, the news and misinformation of central Illinois.

I've previously written about Bayne and some of his shenanigans while he worked at Cities 92.9, as have others, but believe me, volumes more could have been written. This guy is a real piece of work. Unsurprisingly, this clown was fired by Cities 92.9 after his obnoxious and noxious commentary led to declining ratings for the radio station.

I'm a bit mixed regarding my feelings about Bayne's candidacy. As a writer, I look forward to Bayne's victory, because I know I'll have plenty to write about. As a citizen who expects sanity in my government, I hope he loses big time.

Update: The fine citizens of Bloomington added another political loss to Bayne's growing list when only 14% of voters supported Bayne in the February 28th primary.

Don't go away mad Ian, just go away.

Thursday, December 8, 2016

The Trump Transgressions Timeline Part I


From the moment Donald Trump stepped into the political arena, his words and actions have demonstrated consistently that he is a racist, and a pathological liar who lacks the temperament and mental capacity to be the leader of the most powerful nation on the planet. We are in some very dark times my friends, and with that in mind, a much needed resource is a timeline of Trump's transgressions, lest they disappear down the memory hole. A one stop shop if you will, to read, and to weep, for our country's future.

This is very much a work in progress, as this president, and the people who make up his administration, demonstrate incompetence on a near daily basis. This is part I of the timeline, which is broken up into 6 sections (Pre-campaign Transgressions, Campaign Trail Transgressions, President Elect Transgressions, Pre-impeachment Transgressions, Post-impeachment/Pandemic Transgressions and Post 2020 Election Transgressions). Part II, Part III, Part IV and Part V can be found at the following links:

Trump Transgressions Timeline Part II - June 17, 2019 to March 1, 2020

Trump Transgressions Timeline Part III - March 1, 2020 to November 3, 2020

Trump Transgressions Timeline Part IV - November 4, 2020 to January 6, 2022

Trump Transgressions Timeline Part V - January 7, 2022 to March 29, 2023

Trump Transgressions Timeline Part VI - March 30, 2023 to the Present

Note to Donald Trump supporters: If you take issue with any of the entries in this timeline, then please try - if you can - to imagine the back side of a very large hand, and extending from that hand, straight up into the air, a lone middle finger. Only after you've conjured that image into your imagination will you have a clearer picture of what I think of your concerns.

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Local Conservative Voice vs National Unemployment Statistics

There are two ways of lying. One, not telling the truth and the other, making up statistics - Josephina Vazquez Mota

Author's Note: This is a post I was working on in April of 2013 when Robert Rees was still at the helm of Cities 92.9. For reasons that escape me right now, this post didn't make it onto the pages of facepalming. A lot has changed at Cities since that time, except of course for the bucket loads of stupidity that stream from their call letters on a daily basis. So sit back, and enjoy this look back at an earlier Cities 92.9 master of stupidity:

Robert Rees has a problem with facts and data.
Robert Rees

During Thursday's segment of The Morning Rush with Robert Rees on Cities 92.9, Robert expressed shock and dismay that anyone would point a finger of blame at anyone but Barack Obama for the unemployment numbers of the last 4 years. He claimed he had spoken with people during the 2012 presidential campaign who blamed George Bush for those numbers, and he just couldn't understand how anyone could reach that conclusion. Lucky for Robert, I happen to know why some people have reached that conclusion, and I'm happy to share that bit of information with him. But, before doing that, I need to address a comment that Robert made during the segment:
ROBERT REES: George Bush averaged 4.5% unemployment during his term.
Uh, wrong.

The average unemployment rate was higher than 4.5% in all eight years of George W Bush's presidency. Anybody that understands averages - which usually means fourth graders on up - will tell you that the average of a set of numbers will never be lower than the smallest number used to calculate that average.

Of course, accurate information begins with accurate resources, and since Robert has a pretty shaky track record in that department, it shouldn't surprise anyone when his numbers clash with reality. For those of us who live in the reality based community, there are reliable resources available for just about anything, and for labor statistics, oddly enough, we turn to places like the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

What follows is a chart showing the average unemployment rate for every month of the Bush presidency, courtesy of the Bureau of Labor Statistics:


The graph doesn't show yearly averages, or a cumulative average for the entire eight years, but those aren't hard to figure out, hell, any fourth grader could do it. I went ahead and calculated those averages myself, and assuming I can calculate averages as well as a fourth grader, I came up with the following yearly averages, and yes, I rounded up and down where appropriate:

2001 - 4.7%
2002 - 5.8%
2003 - 6.0%
2004 - 5.5%
2005 - 5.1%
2006 - 4.6%
2007 - 4.6%
2008 - 6.3%

Since the range consists of 4.6% on the low end, and 6.3% on the high end, the average must fall somewhere in between, which rules out Robert's 4.5%. To check my accuracy, you can calculate the overall average yourself. I concluded that the overall unemployment average for the Bush presidency comes out to be approximately 5.3%, which is almost a full percentage point above the 4.5% number that Robert pulled from his nether regions.

Robert then asked the following question:
ROBERT REES: How can they blame Bush for 8 + percentage of unemployment during Obama's four years? 
How can they indeed.

Well, let's take a closer look at the numbers. Prior to 2008, the highest monthly unemployment average during the Bush years occurred in June of 2003. During that month, unemployment averaged 6.3%, which, along with a few other months that year with numbers hovering around 6%, contributed to making 2003 the second worst year for Bush in terms of unemployment numbers. But again, that was prior to 2008. Answering Robert's question requires looking at the worst year for unemployment numbers during the Bush years. The worst year for Bush in terms of unemployment numbers was 2008, which not only served as the last year of Bush's presidency, but set the bar for the beginning of the Obama presidency.

Let's look again at the Bush unemployment numbers, but this time using a graph courtesy of the Bureau of Labor  Statistics:

If you look at the right side of the graph, you'll see that unemployment began to rise in early 2007, and continued unabated throughout the entire year of 2008. By December of 2008 - a month prior to Obama being sworn in as the next president - unemployment exceeded 7%, and was still rising. In fact, it was in December of 2008 that the Bush administration acknowledged for the first time that we were in a recession, but this concession only came after months of denial, and after the release of a government report that December showing the biggest month of job losses in 34 years.

Let's now take a look at the unemployment numbers for the Obama presidency, courtesy of the Bureau of Labor Statistics:


Notice that at the very moment that Barack Obama was being sworn in for his first term, which occurred on January 20th of 2009, the unemployment rate had already breached 8%, and was still climbing. A huge contrast to the stable economy, and the 4.2% unemployment that ushered in the beginning of the Bush years.

Now look again - courtesy of the Bureau of Labor Statistics - at a graphical representation of the Obama unemployment numbers:



Notice the sharp increase in unemployment numbers at the very beginning of the Obama presidency - a continuation of the increase from the Bush years - that peaks in October of 2009 at 10%, and has declined ever since. It shouldn't surprise anyone that the Obama presidency registers a larger unemployment average than the Bush years. But is it fair to compare the average unemployment under Bush - who was handed a stable economy at 4.2% unemployment - with the average unemployment under Obama - who was handed an economy in free fall at over 8% unemployment?

Conservative commentators - like Robert Rees - would have us believe that Obama is to blame for the high unemployment numbers that have plagued his presidency, but to do that, Rober has to rely on his audience being completely ignorant of the fact that the Obama presidency inherited an economy in sharp decline.
ROBERT REES: Where do they get their information from?
That's easy Robert, they get their information from reality, which is not where you get your information from, obviously.

Friday, May 29, 2015

I Don't Get the Joke

The mind of the bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract. - Oliver Wendell Holmes -

Aaron Halliday insists that he is not a bigot. He is the owner of Checker Cab in Bloomington, Illinois, and recently came under fire for putting up a sign containing the following quote in front of his business:
"Things I trust more than Obama a Palestinian on a motorcycle"

















When asked about the sign, Halliday had this to say:

Aaron Halliday: "Now when I read this, the only thing I could think of was action movies where the hero is trying to get away and is chased on a motorcycle by a man (typically) who is wielding a knife or a gun. Picture Indiana Jones being chased through the desert. This is what I thought of when I read this. It was not meant to offend anyone. It was in my opinion, humor. It's a joke"

A protester from the group Not In Our Town (NIOT) explained the sign this way:

Protester: "Checker Cab's sign is a passive-aggressive use of a racial and ethnic stereotype to promote a political agenda. We do not care about political views. We do care about stopping the promotion of hate."

Naturally, a representative from our local Conservative News and Misinformation radio station (Cities 92.9) showed up to defend the sign:

Benjamin Yount defends bigoted quote on sign in front of local business

Yes, it's a joke, we all get that. However, when finding a joke humorous requires adherence to a negative stereotype about a specific group of people, like Palestinians for instance, then that joke is based on prejudice, and is by definition bigoted. Too bad only some of us get that.

Personally, I think the sign just to the left of Benjamin Yount's head does a pretty thorough job of describing both the Checkered Cab sign, and Cities 92.9.

Friday, November 28, 2014

Ian Bayne and Stupid Questions

"The trouble with the world is that stupid people are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt" -Bertrand Russell


Ian Bayne
Remember that Illinois Republican candidate for Congress who compared Christian bigot Phil Robertson to Civil Rights icon Rosa Parks? Of course you do. Who could forget that belly laugh.

Well, guess what? He's still at it. Still at it meaning he's still introducing more than his fair share of stupidity into our world.

After Ian Bayne garnered less than 4% of the vote in the Republican primary for the 11th Congressional District of Illinois, where pandering to the stupid vote inspired his ridiculous Robertson/Parks comparison, he took a job with our own local conservative radio station, Cities 92.9, as the host of The Morning Buzz with Ian Bayne, a 3 hour talk show that airs from 5 to 8 am on weekdays.

What a seamless transition it was from pandering to stupid voters to commanding a microphone at the Cities 92.9 studios. It was as though Cities and Bayne were manufactured together, one for the other. Cities has a long history of peddling stupidity, and who could possibly carry that torch better than the guy who thinks the anti-gay and anti-Civil Rights comments made by Phil Robertson were Rosa Parks level courageous.

In Bayne's defense, there were a lot of white people in the South who were lynched during Phil Robertson's lifetime for simply expressing their Christian views. Not!

So, what sort of stupidity has Ian Bayne been involved with since becoming a part of the Cities 92.9 family?

I'm glad you asked.

I've already blogged about one of Bayne's brilliant bouts with stupidity. This one occurred this past summer when Bayne started a campaign called Flock the Tax Hike, which was promoted as a revolt against unnecessary increases in local taxes, and which blatantly misrepresented the purpose of those tax increases. That campaign fizzled out rather quickly as support stayed confined to a small group of the most credulous listeners of Cities 92.9.

A more recent example of Bayne's stupidity occurred on November 18th, when Bayne sent a Cities 92.9 employee he calls Fistbump over to the ISU campus to question students about their position on global warming.

Why did Bayne pick the 18th?

Well, it was cold outside, and in Bayne's world, cold days aren't possible in central Illinois in mid November when the planet is warming. I kid you not, you just can't make this stuff up.

Most of the students who were questioned in the audio clip seem to accept that global warming is occurring, and most credit science for that acceptance. Bayne's reaction to the pro science responses are met with derision as he wonders aloud if science is the new god on the ISU campus. You see, in Bayne's world, accepting what 97% of the world's climate experts tell us about climate change is bad, because it's akin to faith. Ironically, what never occurs to Bayne, who regularly promotes faith on his radio show, is that this line of attack works against the concept of faith itself, not science. Way to lean into your own punch, moron!

If you thought the pinnacle of that morning's stupidity occurred with the faith comparison, brace yourself for the following exchange between Fistbump and an ISU student:

FISTBUMP: I just wanted to see if you believe in global warming or not.

STUDENT: It's hard not to with the way things are going.

FISTBUMP: You do realize it's 18 degrees out in the middle of November right? Makes it a little bit hard to believe in.

So, according to our friend Fistbump, a local cold temperature makes it hard to believe in global warming. This is what passes for stimulating, informative talk, on Cities 92.9.



Climate Science 101 for the benefit of fistbump and the rest of the Cities staff: The operative word in global warming is the word global.

Had our scientifically illiterate friends at Cities 92.9 bothered to do just a tiny bit of research that morning, prior to putting their ignorance into the form of a question, they would have discovered that the average temperature over the entire Northern Hemisphere on the 18th of November was higher than normal, as was the average temperature for the entire planet, even though approximately 85% of the contiguous United States was experiencing lower than normal temperatures.







An oft repeated phrase on college campuses across the country is that there is no such thing as a stupid question, but on November 18th, that phrase ceased to be true at Illinois State University thanks to Fistbump, Ian Bayne, and Cities 92.9.

Monday, July 14, 2014

Flock the Misinformation! A Story of Deception and Redemption

See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda - George W Bush

Have you ever known anyone to stick their foot so deep in their mouth that the sole of their shoe actually left an impression on their colon? I didn't think it was possible, but it happened recently right here in central Illinois. What follows is an accounting of this incredible incident.

The story begins with the 2014 city budget of Bloomington, Illinois, which included a proposal to help fund a new flamingo exhibit at the Miller Park Zoo. The exhibit - which is expected to increase zoo attendance by 5% - is also expected to pay for itself over a 3 year period. The up front cost to the city of Bloomington: $150,000.

Additionally, the city of Bloomington levied additional taxes on entertainment, and adopted a motor fuel tax, which they define on the city website as follows:
The Local Motor Fuel Tax was adopted by the city to tax motor fuel at four cent ($0.04) per gallon for the sale of motor fuel to raise revenue for the City's street resurfacing program.
Our story now turns to Cities 92.9, a local radio station with a documented history of spreading misinformation, and which seems to be fueled, at least in part, by a perpetual state of feigned outrage for anything government. In response to the tax increases, Cities - and more specifically morning host Ian Bayne - began a campaign called Flock the Tax Hike (an obvious double entendre), in which listeners were encouraged to place plastic pink flamingos in their yards as a form of protest.

Benjamin Yount
I didn't personally pay much attention to this silly campaign in the beginning, but that changed recently when Benjamin Yount, the self proclaimed Illinois watchdog, made a big deal over an email the station had received from Nora Dukowitz, who works as the Communications Director for the city of Bloomington. Nora's email rattled the watchdog so much, that he decided to read it on the air in its entirety. Before reading it, Benjamin asked his listeners to "find the tone. Tell me what you hear when I read this email". So, as Benjamin read Nora's email, I did exactly as he asked, and I listened for the tone. Here is that email in its entirety:
Cities 92.9,
In response to the Cities 92.9 Flock the Taxes Campaign, I would like to address the misleading and incorrect information regarding the city of Bloomington and Miller Park Zoo.
First, your campaign implies that the recently passed local motor fuel tax will fund Miller Park's flamingo exhibit. In fact, funds generated from the motor fuel tax are earmarked for road repairs and improvements. Your campaign also suggests that funds produced by the amusement tax are devoted solely to the zoo's flamingo exhibit. Funds from the amusement tax are one income stream of many that funnel into the city's general fund. The general fund pays for a wide variety of items including police and fire protection, planning and economic development, and general administration of the cities activities, among other things. Of the city's 91.8 million dollar general fund budget, approximately $150,000 or .16% is budgeted for Miller Park's flamingo exhibit.
In the spirit of true public private partnership, the Miller Park Zoological Society is also contributing $100,000 of its own funds towards the exhibit. The flamingos themselves are funded by the Ewing Zoo Foundation. This separate private foundation has partnered with Miller Park Zoo since 1967 to fund the acquisition and shipping costs of new animals for the zoo.
This exhibit is the initial project outlined in Miller park's zoo master plan adopted in 2012 and strategically phased to improve both the physical aspect of the zoo and its financial sustainability. The flamingo exhibit is expected to  increase zoo attendance by 5% or 6,000 guests and  generate interest from the community for an additional private philanthropic support. The improvements at the zoo make it more sustainable and are anticipated to lower the subsidy received by the zoo from the city of Bloomington.
Following the completion of the flamingo exhibit the zoo will begin work on a 700,000 dollar entrance improvement project funded entirely through the Illinois Public Museum Capital Grant program . The improvements include a new De Brazza's monkey exhibit, renovations to the zoo's entrance, and an additional parking lot to serve all of Miller Park.
In light of these facts, I hope you will immediately correct the misleading and incorrect information on your Flock the Taxes Campaign.
What I heard as far as tone goes was a polite, mild mannered, fact filled request for Cities 92.9 to stop spreading misinformation about the new taxes and their relationship - or lack thereof - to the upcoming flamingo exhibit at the Miller Park Zoo. I had been exposed to misinformation from Cities 92.9 before, so the accusation that they were now misinforming listeners certainly didn't seem out of line. Of course, Benjamin wasn't having any of it:
Benjamin Yount: Nora, thank you for the email. You are wrong, and I don't care if you think we are misleading people. We are telling people the truth .Gas taxes are going up 4 cents a gallon.  The city has raised taxes on entertainment and utilities among other things. The city has decided that its priority is $150,000 for flamingos. All of those things are correct. Because it hurts your feelings or doesn't carry the company line? That's a you problem, not a me problem.  By the way Nora, I don't see how someone whose getting a 100 grand from the city, maybe we'll do this, maybe we'll fire you and then we can pay for the flamingos. How about that? So, between your salary of $100,000 and the flamingo money of $150,000, what's the total percentage there Nora? The tone of this email, and correct me if I'm wrong - the cities 92.9 text line 309 807 1600 - is essentially, stop being mean to us. Just stop being mean! Just no! (lots of huffing and puffing and pouting sounds) No come on, don't be mean, people won't like the zoo! And big government is good. Look, the state is giving us $700,000 for monkeys, why are you jumping on us for the flamingos! Nora, it's the same damn thing.
So, according to this story's protagonist, Cities 92.9 has not misled anybody about the new taxes, and anybody who accuses them of doing so is acting like a petulant second grader. For those of you who are familiar with literary elements, such as foreshadowing, then you already know where this story is leading. But before we get to that a-ha moment, sit back and watch how a fisherman reels in a really big fish:
Benjamin Yount:   We've gotten to the point where you can't even object. People send me texts and emails and they say Ben, there are people at city hall who are really mad about this flamingo thing, to which I say, grow up. You're mad about little plastic birds?
Really Benjamin, do you seriously believe that there are people at city hall who are angry because Cities 92.9 is encouraging listeners to place plastic pink flamingos in their yards? Good grief. After hearing this, I think I rolled my eyes so far back into my head that I swear I saw grey matter. Naturally, I had to respond with the following text message to Benjamin:
Arnold Facepalmer: I doubt anybody at city hall is angry about the flamingos. If anything, they're angry about the misinformation they represent.
Benjamin then read my text on the air, and in response, made the following statement:
Benjamin Yount: This is the line you're going to hear about our flock the tax hike promotion. We say simply 3 things: gas prices are going up on August 1st because of the gasoline tax, the budget includes taxes on entertainment, which includes things like bowling and movies and the city of Bloomington is going to spend more than a hundred thousand dollars on flamingos. We say those three things. We do not say the city is raising gas taxes to pay for flamingos. That's not correct. We simply say the reason you are paying more in taxes for everything is because this is a city that cannot live within its means. Here is a perfect example, a perfect visualization of the wants versus needs mentality at city hall and it's the pink flamingo. But because we don't carry the party line, city hall is taken to saying we are putting out misinformation. You get it. I get it. They can't argue that they are in any way responsible with our money, so they  have to argue the tiny well, technically you're not correct. Technically we are correct, and in the big picture we are correct.
So, according to Benjamin Yount, Cities 92.9 is not saying that the city is raising gas taxes to pay for flamingos, because of course, that would be wrong. So, maybe Benjamin would like to explain the following promotional poster located on the Cities 92.9 website:


Ouch! That's going to leave a mark. I don't believe there's any other way to interpret the statement "All to fund Miller Park Zoo's Flamingo Exhibit" than that it means the taxes were raised specifically to fund the flamingo exhibit, just as Nora Dukowitz pointed out in her letter.

And in the spirit of weapons grade irony, Benjamin followed up reading Nora's letter with this statement:
Benjamin Yount: If this community can have a discussion about flamingos, an honest discussion about flamingos, then perhaps someone could defend the zoo.
I don't think the word honest means what Benjamin thinks it means.

This may seem like the end of this story, but a good story isn't complete without an introspective moral that audiences can take away with them to improve their lives. The moral to this particular story is twofold. First, honesty is always the best policy, and by honesty, I mean real honesty, not phony appeals for honesty from people who make their living working for a dishonest enterprise. And second, if you ever do decide to double down on your misrepresentations, check that you aren't contradicted by your own promotional materials first.

And you know, this story doesn't have to end with Cities 92.9 looking bad. Yes, they have lied. And yes, they've lied many, many times. But they can still save face and salvage some of their reputation and integrity by doing two things; First, they can admit that Nora Dukowitz was correct when she called their campaign misleading. And second, offer a heartfelt apology to people like Nora Dukowitz and any other city hall employees they've shamelessly tried to bully. I know, admitting you're wrong and apologizing is not always an easy thing to do, but it is a necessary thing to do if you value the respect of others.

If you do decide to do the right thing Benjamin, I'd recommend having that foot removed first.

Update - July 26, 2014

I  checked the Cities 92.9 website today to see if it was still carrying the misleading promotional poster I posted above, and to my surprise, I found that it had been removed and replaced with this one:


Notice the change in wording. It is obvious that someone at Cities 92.9 now recognizes that Nora Dukowitz was correct when she accused the station of spreading misinformation. It's a shame that it took this write up to raise that awareness.

Now, how about that apology?

Update - August 24, 2014

I couldn't resist checking back again with Cities 92.9 to see how they might be advertising their Flock the Taxes promotion. What I found was that their poster had once again been changed, apparently this time to include one of their major advertisers, and entice people to check their facenbook page. What's funny about this poster is the glaring misspelling. Yeah, we all misspell things from time to time, but Cities is in the business of putting everybody else under a microscope, but can't be bothered to do something as simple as check the spelling on a promotional poster.

Here's the poster, see if you can spot the error:



If you didn't spot the error, it will become more evident if you try looking on the internet for the Cities 92.9 Facenbook page.